I am quite keen on functional programming techniques, so I am sort of disappointed in myself today. I am disappointed because I have had to change the state of some data, but for the best of reasons considering the use case. I went so far as to write a class that did what I needed it to do without interfering with the original data, but that just felt wrong, as though I was hiding what I was doing and I am not sure if I should try to hide my guilt. On the upside, I did use recursion!
Anyway, my use case required some fragments of a string to be spat to a backend where they would then be stitched back together again. I could send the whole string in one go, but it could be arbitrarily large, so I need to chomp through it and spit each uniform chunk back to the server.
I spent ages thinking about it then, as is so often the case, I went to JSFiddle and wrote this:
const container = document.getElementById("data"); const ourString = "1234567"; const chunkSize = 2; const sendChunk = (ourString) => { const chunk = ourString.substr(0, chunkSize); const div = document.createElement("div"); div.textContent = `Sending: ${chunk}`; container.appendChild(div); ourString = ourString.slice(chunkSize); if (ourString.length) { sendChunk(ourString); } else { const finalDiv = document.createElement("div"); finalDiv.textContent = "All Done!"; container.appendChild(finalDiv); } }; sendChunk(ourString);
Along with this simple bit of HTML:
<div id="data"></div>
Basically it uses substr and slice to extract and then remove a portion of the string. If the string still has a length it then repeats the process, otherwise it tells us we’re all done. Neat eh? I just wish it didn’t feel so dirty.
No comments:
Post a Comment